Resources

Resources at Emory

• Emory Center for Ethics
• Emory Institutional Review Board (IRB)
• Emory Office of Research Compliance
• Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
• Emory Division of Animal Resources
• Yerkes National Primate Research Center
• Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance

External Resources

• Ethics CORE
• Office of Research Integrity
• EthicShare

Data Managment

• Baker, Timothy D. “Confidentiality and Electronic Surveys: How IRBs Address Ethical and Technical Issues.” IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34, no. 5 (October 2012): 8–15.
• Easter, Michele M., Arlene M. Davis, and Gail E. Henderson. “Confidentiality: More Than a Linkage File and a Locked Drawer.” IRB: Ethics & Human Research 26, no. 2 (April 2004): 13–17.
• Marco, C A, and G L Larkin. “Research Ethics: Ethical Issues of Data Reporting and the Quest for Authenticity.” Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 7, no. 6 (June 2000): 691–694.
• Rodriguez, Laura L., Lisa D. Brooks, Judith H. Greenberg, and Eric D. Green. “The Complexities of Genomic Identifiability.” Science 339, no. 6117 (January 18, 2013): 275–276. doi:10.1126/science.1234593.
• Ross, Laine Friedman, Howard M Saal, Karen L David, and Rebecca R Anderson.“Technical Report: Ethical and Policy Issues in Genetic Testing and Screening of Children.” Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics (February 21, 2013). doi:10.1038/gim.2012.176.
• Soteriou, Tony, Gill Hek, and Selena Gray. “Patient Confidentiality, Clinical Data and NHS Research — a Researcher’s Guide.” Nurse Researcher 13, no. 2 (2005): 19–26.
• Steinsbekk, Kristin Solum, and Berge Solberg. “Should Genetic Findings from Genome Research Be Reported Back to the Participants?” Tidsskrift for Den Norske Lægeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin, Ny Række 132, no. 19 (October 16, 2012): 2190–2193.
• Wiesenauer, Matthias, Christian Johner, and Rainer Röhrig. “Secondary Use of Clinical Data in Healthcare Providers — an Overview on Research, Regulatory and Ethical Requirements.” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 180 (2012): 614–618.
• Debra Parrish and Bridget Noonan,“Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct,” Science and Engineering Ethics 15:2 (June 2009): 161-167.

Authorship

• Dena Plemmons, “A Broader Discussion of Authorship,” Science and Engineering Ethics 17:2 (June 2011): 389-398.
• Brian Schrag, “Piercing the Veil: Ethical Issues in Ethnographic Research,”Science and Engineering Ethics 15:2 (June 2009): 135-160.

Human Subjects

• Alice Dreger, “Darkness's Descent on the American Anthropological Association,” Human Nature 22:3 (September 2011): 225-246.
• Charles C. Mann, “Chagnon Critics Overstepped Bounds, Historian Says,”Science 326.5959 (2009):1466-1466.
• Hugh Gusterson, “Anthropologists and war: A response to David Kilcullen,”Anthropology Today 23:4 (August 2007).
• Alison Rooke, “Queer in the Field: On Emotions, Temporality, and Performativity in Ethnography,” Journal of Lesbian Studies 13:2 (2009): 149-160. 

Scholarly Misconduct

• Anne Jamison, “Plagiarism, popularity, and the dilemma of artistic worth,”European Journal of English Studies 11:1 (April 2007): 65-78.
• Elizabeth Blanks Hindman, “Jayson Blair, The New York Times, and Paradigm Repair,” Journal of Communication 55:2 (June 2005): 225-241.
• Cheryl K. Stenmark et. al., “Ethics in the Humanities: Findings from Focus Groups,” Journal of Academic Ethics 8:4 (December 2010): 285-300.
• Katherine Alfredo and Hillary Hart, “The University and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Who is Responsible for What?,” Science and Engineering Ethics17:2 (September 2011): 447-457.

Conflict of Interest

• John Bohannon, “War as a Laboratory For Trauma Research,” Science331:6022 (2011):1261-1263.
• Greg Miller, “Terrorism Charges against Grad Student Raise Questions,”Science 326:5960 (2009):1609-1609.